Results
Sort
Reset
arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 11d ago

ROVE: Reinforcement Learning with Human Interventions for Humanoid Manipulation

ROVE enables humanoid Vision-Language-Action models to learn effective manipulation behaviors using imperfect human interventions. It combines a human-in-the-loop data collection pipeline with Optimistic Value Estimation and cross-embodiment supervision to prioritize high-value actions and improve robustness. ROVE outperforms baseline methods on real-world, contact-rich manipulation tasks through iterative rollout and intervention cycles.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 11d ago

HABC Improves RL Fine-Tuning of VLAs with Sparse Outcomes

Hierarchical Advantage-Weighted Behavior Cloning (HABC) enhances online RL fine-tuning of vision-language agents by using separate critic heads for viability and efficiency. It combines their outputs via a state-adaptive gate and applies per-transition weights, while intervention-aware credit assignment prevents supervision leakage. In real-robot experiments, HABC boosts success rates to 92%, 88%, and 38% on three bimanual tasks, surpassing SFT baselines of 36%, 44%, and 12%.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 11d ago

Geometric Action Model for Robot Policy Learning

The Geometric Action Model (GAM) enables robot policies to reason about 3D physical interactions by repurposing a pretrained geometric foundation model. GAM splits the GFM to serve as both an observation encoder and a causal future predictor, then routes predicted future geometry and actions through the same backbone, achieving accurate, robust, and efficient manipulation performance in simulation and real-robot benchmarks.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 11d ago

Causal Model of Theory of Mind in AI Conflict

This paper proposes a structural causal model using a directed acyclic graph to define when Theory of Mind engagement is causally warranted in human-machine conflict. The model identifies four exogenous conditions, five mediators, and three causal pathways for ToM activation, with epistemic accuracy as the primary outcome. It offers a resource-rational framework for AI social reasoning, validated through simulation and human-machine studies.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 11d ago

Bayesian Audits Reveal Inconsistent AI Evaluation Timelines

Public AI evaluation archives show that a single terminal result can arise from two distinct pre-terminal histories, with estimated times to reach 95% of performance ceilings at 23.03 or 75.13. A candidate selection-aware frontier model fails synthetic recovery and uncertainty calibration, and is rejected by fixed audit gates. An archive-and-adjudication protocol verifies timing boundaries and falsifies unsupported frontier claims.