Results
Sort
Reset
arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 9d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45% and improve accountability in legal AI deployment.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 9d ago

ProvenanceGuard: Source-Aware Factuality Verification for MCP-Based LLM Agents

ProvenanceGuard introduces a source-aware verifier for MCP-based LLM agents that detects cross-source conflation by routing claims to specific evidence sources and comparing stated attribution with actual source ownership. It achieves block F1 of 0.802 and source accuracy of 0.858 on 260 source-eligible claims, outperforming source-blind baselines, and detects all injected attribution swaps in 50 clinical probes.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 9d ago

Agentic Benchmark Reveals AI Models Fail to Avoid Animal Exploitation

TAC, the first agentic benchmark for implicit animal welfare, tests AI agents' ability to avoid animal exploitation in travel booking scenarios. All seven frontier models score below 64%, with the best at 53%, and even minor prompt improvements yield only modest gains. An audit finds no signs of evaluation awareness, indicating performance gaps stem from lack of true welfare reasoning, not prompt recognition.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 9d ago

RubricsTree: Scalable Evaluation Framework for Personal Health Agents

RubricsTree introduces a hierarchical taxonomy of over 100 clinically-verifiable Boolean rubrics, evolved from 4,000 real user queries via human-in-the-loop curation. It enables scalable, expert-aligned evaluation of personal health agents by dynamically routing queries to relevant rubrics and outperforms baseline methods in alignment, context sensitivity, and model performance gains of up to 66% on HealthBench.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 9d ago

Reversal Q-Learning: A New Off-Policy RL Algorithm

Reversal Q-Learning (RQL) is a new off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm that trains a flow policy using prior data. By modeling flow refinement steps as actions in an expanded Markov decision process and applying virtual on-policy trajectories via reversal, RQL enables effective offline learning without backpropagation through time. Experiments on 50 robotic tasks show RQL achieves the best average performance among state-of-the-art flow-based offline RL methods.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 9d ago

Vision-language models don't always need images for chest X-ray accuracy

A causal audit shows that many vision-language models achieve high chest radiograph accuracy without using images. Text-only models match multimodal models in performance and outperform them in grounding, with accuracy and confidence flags only appearing when image use occurs. These findings suggest that accuracy alone is insufficient to validate clinical deployment, and grounding must be assessed.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 9d ago

Qwen-RobotManip Achieves Generalization in Robotic Manipulation

Qwen-RobotManip, a Vision-Language-Action foundation model, enables large-scale training through unified alignment across representation, motion, and behavior. It uses open-source data to build a 38,100-hour pretraining corpus and demonstrates emergent generalization, outperforming prior state-of-the-art models in out-of-distribution settings and ranking first in RoboChallenge with a 20% relative improvement on real-robot platforms.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 10d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45% and improve accountability in legal AI deployment.