Reasoning models
arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

Expressivity Analysis of Hierarchical Modelling in Deep Transformers

This paper analyzes deep transformer expressiveness using bounded-depth grammars. It constructs transformers with positional attention where model depth scales linearly with grammar depth, and neuron count grows quadratically with production rules. The results support the linear representation hypothesis by showing these models can encode abstract grammatical states in low-dimensional, linearly separable subspaces.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LLM Features Can Hurt GNNs via Concatenation Interference

Concatenating LLM-generated features to graph neural networks systematically reduces accuracy on homophilous benchmarks, with PubMed accuracy dropping by -17.0 ± 0.3 pp. This degradation is linked to LLM-alone discriminability (Delta_sig), which correlates strongly with concatenation cost (r² = 0.38) and shows a power law relationship with feature dimension and node count (r² = 0.97), particularly in low-Delta_sig, low-node scenarios.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LLM-Designed Training Environment for RL with Multi-Agent Reasoning

The LLM-as-Environment-Engineer framework uses LLMs to automatically redesign training environments in reinforcement learning by analyzing failure trajectories and contextual data. On the MAPF-FrozenLake testbed, it outperforms larger proprietary LLMs and fixed-environment baselines, with Qwen3-4B achieving the strongest aggregate performance. Analysis shows that failure evidence and preserved working configurations are key, and the current RL checkpoint performs better than the base model as an environment engineer.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

EComAgentBench: Benchmarking Shopping Agents with Hidden Intent

EComAgentBench introduces a benchmark of 662 real Amazon tasks that scatter shopper requirements across query, profile, and clarification. Agents must uncover hidden intent, verify candidates with evidence, and commit to a product within 100 tool calls, with typed rubrics attributing failures to specific requirement sources. Evaluation shows even top models achieve only 57.1% accuracy, and rubric satisfaction drops when intent is hidden.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

The Slop Paradox: AI Rewriting Degrades Clinical Uncertainty and Cross-Modal Alignment

AI-rewritten radiology reports show significant information loss, with EHR summarization eroding 51.4% of clinical entities and 43.7% of hedging language. Despite preserving image-text alignment, standardized and teaching case tasks reduce cross-modal alignment by 14.9-16.5%, six to seven times more than EHR summarization. The study finds no preferential degradation of rare pathologies and identifies rewriting task type as the key driver of degradation, not clinical content.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

DIFE Audits CLIP Backdoor Exposure Across Deployment Interfaces

DIFE evaluates backdoored CLIP checkpoints across different deployment interfaces, revealing that native success does not guarantee safety in reuse. The framework shows text-side poisoning enables adversarial exposure in retrieval, reranking, and selection tasks, while visual-only use remains largely unaffected. BadTextTower is introduced to generate strong text-conditioned exposure without compromising visual performance.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

Dynamic Rollout Editing Reduces Overthinking in RL-Trained Reasoning Models

Dynamic Rollout Editing (DRE) addresses overthinking in RL-trained reasoning models by modifying successful trajectories post-answer emergence. DRE preserves the correct reasoning prefix while editing unnecessary continuation, weakening the credit assigned to redundant thinking without penalizing valid reasoning. Experiments across diverse tasks demonstrate its effectiveness in reducing overthinking.