Reasoning models
arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 23h ago

BIPC Framework Accelerates Mixed-Integer Optimization with Machine Learning

The BIPC framework reduces solution time for large-scale mixed-integer programs by identifying a backdoor subset of variables that drive computational complexity. Using supervised learning, it predicts backdoor variable values and intervals, then solves a reduced problem with these predictions, achieving significant speedups with minimal quality loss. This enables rapid, high-quality solutions under parameter perturbations in real-world systems like power and supply chains.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 1d ago

Match Task to Objective Framework for Encoder-Decoder Models

This study introduces the Match Task to Objective (MTO) framework to align pre-training and fine-tuning objectives with specific tasks. The framework enables automated, unsupervised data adaptation and delivers performance gains of over 120% in few-shot settings, outperforming baselines in both few-shot and full-dataset scenarios. It also enhances prompt-tuning by providing effective soft prompt engineering guidance.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 1d ago

Transformer Models: Architectures, Applications, and Critical Assessment

This review presents a taxonomy of transformer-based language models across domain verticals, covering encoder-only, decoder-only, encoder-decoder, long-context, permutation-based, and generator-discriminator variants. It evaluates post-2023 advancements like instruction tuning and mixture-of-experts scaling, and assesses model deployments in healthcare, finance, legal, education, customer service, creative writing, and scientific work, linking each to specific capabilities. The paper critically analyzes model architectures on four key deployment axes, quantifies parameter count versus energy cost, and examines how alignment methods, data provenance, and benchmark saturation define 'state of the art'.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 1d ago

Age of LLM: Benchmark for LLM Reasoning and Diplomacy

Age of LLM introduces a turn-based 1v1 benchmark where two LLMs compete on a 13x7 grid under fog of war, full diplomacy, and strict JSON reliability rules. Findings show the nuclear rush dominates, diplomacy is prolific but rarely succeeds, and illegal actions reveal belief-tracking errors, with a weak link between reliability and victory. The corpus is small and unbalanced, and the results offer a preliminary view of LLM reasoning under adversarial uncertainty.