Source · arXiv cs.CL
arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

Causal Activation Directions for Mitigating Emergent Misalignment in Language Models

Fine-tuning language models on insecure code causes emergent misalignment. A shared activation direction across four model families achieves 99.6% separation of aligned and misaligned activations, and subtracting it reduces code spillover by 21-51 points. Cross-architecture transfer shows behavioral suppression but lacks specificity, with within-model directions being causally actionable and cross-model directions only causally real.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

PragReST: Self-Reinforcing Counterfactual Reasoning for Pragmatic Language Understanding

PragReST is a self-supervised framework that enhances large language models' pragmatic reasoning by generating counterfactual reasoning traces and training via supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. It outperforms baseline models on four pragmatic benchmarks, improving Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-14B by 5.37% and 5-5.50% accuracy respectively, and maintains strong performance on general-knowledge and mathematical reasoning tasks.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

Misfired Alignment in LLMs: A Quantitative Study

A new study introduces VETO, a benchmark of 2,032 BBQ-derived contrastive pairs, to quantify misfired alignment in large language models. It defines the Misfired Alignment Rate (MAR) and finds that all benchmarked LLMs exhibit MARs between 4.7% and 18.9%, while human participants achieve 0%. The research shows alignment cues can amplify these failures, with evidence suppression occurring in late layers of models and emerging after instruction training.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

Data Recipe Boosts Long-Context Reasoning in LLMs

A data-centric approach improves long-context reasoning in large language models, using eight curated datasets with 14K examples across retrieval, multi-evidence synthesis, and reasoning tasks. When paired with minimal outcome-based GRPO training, it achieves average gains of +7.2 to +6.4 points on seven benchmarks, outperforming prior RL training sets, and enhances agentic performance by +4.8 and +7.0 points on GAIA and BrowseComp respectively.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

REVES: Augmented Training for Test-Time Scaling

REVES introduces a two-stage iterative framework that enhances large language model reasoning through sequential revision and verification. It achieves +6.5 points over RL baselines and +4.0 points over standard multi-turn training on LiveCodeBench, using a 4B base model with fewer rollouts than larger systems. The method improves error correction and generalizes to out-of-distribution puzzles like n_queens and mini_sudoku.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

SenFlow: Advanced AI-Generated Text Detection in Hybrid Documents

SenFlow introduces a novel method for detecting AI-generated text in hybrid documents by modeling inter-sentence dependencies. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on MOSAIC, a benchmark of 16,000 documents from PubMed and XSum, with a +4.15 pp Macro-F1 gain on cross-domain transfer. SenFlow reveals that AI-generated content still exhibits generator-dependent sentence-length patterns, exploitable by sentence-level detectors despite perplexity filtering.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Models

GraphPO introduces a directed acyclic graph framework to represent reasoning rollouts, merging semantically equivalent paths to reduce redundant exploration. It assigns efficiency and correctness advantages to edges, improving inference efficiency and process supervision while reducing advantage-estimation variance. Experiments show GraphPO outperforms chain- and tree-based methods on three LLMs across reasoning and agentic search tasks under identical token or response budgets.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45% and improve accountability in legal AI deployment.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

ProvenanceGuard: Source-Aware Factuality Verification for MCP-Based LLM Agents

ProvenanceGuard introduces a source-aware verifier for MCP-based LLM agents that detects cross-source conflation by routing claims to specific evidence sources and comparing stated attribution with actual source ownership. It achieves block F1 of 0.802 and source accuracy of 0.858 on 260 source-eligible claims, outperforming source-blind baselines, and detects all injected attribution swaps in 50 clinical probes.