Topic · Evaluation & benchmarks
arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 6d ago

Lean as Process-Verified Reward Oracle in RL for Theorem Proving

This work shows that Lean can serve as a symbolic process oracle, providing fine-grained, verified feedback during reinforcement learning. By parsing proof attempts into tactic sequences and using Lean's elaboration to mark sound steps and first failures, the system generates dense, type-theoretic reward signals. Experiments demonstrate tactic-level supervision outperforms outcome-only methods on benchmarks like MiniF2F and ProofNet, highlighting Lean's role as both evaluator and training reward source.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 6d ago

MACR: Explicit Conflict Resolution for LLM Inference

MACR introduces a multi-agent reasoning framework to resolve knowledge conflicts in LLM inference by jointly assessing internal and external knowledge. It uses semantic entropy to measure confidence and employs three specialized agents to induce rules, detect conflicts, and resolve inconsistencies across contexts. Empirical results show MACR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and provides interpretable conflict resolutions.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 6d ago

CRAX: Fast Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarking

CRAX introduces a high-fidelity, accelerated safety benchmark for reinforcement learning using MuJoCo XLA. It achieves up to 100x speedups over CPU-based benchmarks via vectorization and hardware acceleration, featuring six environment suites and three agent-specific tasks across three difficulty levels. Evaluation of six safe RL methods shows no single approach dominates, highlighting trade-offs between performance and safety, with curriculum learning and safety transfer improving results.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 6d ago

CRAX: Fast Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarking

CRAX introduces a high-fidelity, fast safety benchmark for reinforcement learning using MuJoCo XLA. It achieves up to 100x speedups over CPU-based benchmarks via vectorization and hardware acceleration, featuring six environment suites and three agent-specific tasks across three difficulty levels. Evaluation of six safe RL methods shows no single approach dominates, highlighting trade-offs between performance and safety, with curriculum learning and safety transfer improving results.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

Selective Verification for Budget-Aware Reasoning

Sevra, a serving-layer controller, selectively verifies answers to improve accuracy and reduce token usage. On \mathfive, it achieves 76.3% accuracy with 26.8% fewer post-generation tokens and halved harmful flips, while on \gsm it verifies only 3.0% of examples, boosting accuracy to 94.5% and cutting verification tokens by 91.2%. The study shows that initial solve length and explicit control needs determine optimal verification strategy.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

Control-Window Law for Single-Neuron Steering in Language Models

A new framework defines when single-neuron interventions coherently control model behaviors without output collapse. The control window, based on alignment and norm ratios, predicts behavior triggers and collapse ceilings using forward pass data, with high accuracy on held-out neurons. On refusal, control is typed: coherent bypass occurs without actionable content, while genuine actionable reach appears only in specific cases and at later rollout stages.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

REDACT: Multilingual PII Benchmark with Systematic Control

REDACT introduces a systematically controlled multilingual benchmark for personally identifiable information detection, featuring 51 entity types, 4,127 surface-form patterns, and 25 languages. It evaluates five detectors across 1,000 records, revealing that rule-based models fail on high-stakes data while LLMs perform better, especially in high-sensitivity categories. A reference-free LLM assessment confirms sensitivity-tier assignment as the most challenging evaluation axis.