Topic · Safety & alignment
arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 6d ago

CRAX: Fast Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarking

CRAX introduces a high-fidelity, fast safety benchmark for reinforcement learning using MuJoCo XLA. It achieves up to 100x speedups over CPU-based benchmarks via vectorization and hardware acceleration, featuring six environment suites and three agent-specific tasks across three difficulty levels. Evaluation of six safe RL methods shows no single approach dominates, highlighting trade-offs between performance and safety, with curriculum learning and safety transfer improving results.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

Control-Window Law for Single-Neuron Steering in Language Models

A new framework defines when single-neuron interventions coherently control model behaviors without output collapse. The control window, based on alignment and norm ratios, predicts behavior triggers and collapse ceilings using forward pass data, with high accuracy on held-out neurons. On refusal, control is typed: coherent bypass occurs without actionable content, while genuine actionable reach appears only in specific cases and at later rollout stages.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

REDACT: Multilingual PII Benchmark with Systematic Control

REDACT introduces a systematically controlled multilingual benchmark for personally identifiable information detection, featuring 51 entity types, 4,127 surface-form patterns, and 25 languages. It evaluates five detectors across 1,000 records, revealing that rule-based models fail on high-stakes data while LLMs perform better, especially in high-sensitivity categories. A reference-free LLM assessment confirms sensitivity-tier assignment as the most challenging evaluation axis.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 6d ago

Causal Activation Directions for Mitigating Emergent Misalignment in Language Models

Fine-tuning language models on insecure code causes emergent misalignment. A shared activation direction across four model families achieves 99.6% separation of aligned and misaligned activations, and subtracting it reduces code spillover by 21-51 points. Cross-architecture transfer shows behavioral suppression but lacks specificity, with within-model directions being causally actionable and cross-model directions only causally real.

media Don't Worry About the Vase · 6d ago

White House Pauses AI Deployment

The U.S. White House paused the deployment of frontier AI models, including Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, citing a reported 'jailbreak' where the AI could identify and fix security vulnerabilities in code. Anthropic has been working with the Trump Administration to resolve the issue, but experts argue that the problem is fundamental—AI either can write secure code or it cannot, making a fix impossible without undermining its defensive capabilities.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

Misfired Alignment in LLMs: A Quantitative Study

A new study introduces VETO, a benchmark of 2,032 BBQ-derived contrastive pairs, to quantify misfired alignment in large language models. It defines the Misfired Alignment Rate (MAR) and finds that all benchmarked LLMs exhibit MARs between 4.7% and 18.9%, while human participants achieve 0%. The research shows alignment cues can amplify these failures, with evidence suppression occurring in late layers of models and emerging after instruction training.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 8d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45%, offering actionable diagnostics for trustworthy legal AI deployment.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45% and improve accountability in legal AI deployment.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

Agentic Benchmark Reveals AI Models Fail to Avoid Animal Exploitation

TAC, the first agentic benchmark for implicit animal welfare, tests AI agents' ability to avoid animal exploitation in travel booking scenarios. All seven frontier models score below 64%, with the best at 53%, and even minor prompt improvements yield only modest gains. An audit finds no signs of evaluation awareness, indicating performance gaps stem from lack of true welfare reasoning, not prompt recognition.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 8d ago

Vision-language models don't always need images for chest X-ray accuracy

A causal audit shows that many vision-language models achieve high chest radiograph accuracy without using images. Text-only models match multimodal models in performance and outperform them in grounding, with accuracy and confidence flags only appearing when image use occurs. These findings suggest that accuracy alone is insufficient to validate clinical deployment, and grounding must be assessed.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 8d ago

LegalHalluLens: Auditing Hallucinations in Legal AI

LegalHalluLens introduces a framework to audit AI hallucinations in legal contexts by analyzing typed hallucination profiles across four claim categories. It reveals a 38-40 point gap between obligation/numeric and temporal claims, and shows two systems with identical 52% hallucination rates can have opposite risk directions. The framework uses a Risk Direction Index and calibrated debate pipelines to reduce fabricated detections by 45% and improve accountability in legal AI deployment.