AI agents
arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

AIPatient Arena: EHR-grounded evaluation of LLMs in clinical workflows

AIPatient Arena evaluates large language models in end-to-end clinical consultations using EHR-grounded patient-specific knowledge graphs. It assesses LLMs across eight clinical competence dimensions, revealing strong performance in interview skills, ethics, and explanation clarity, but persistent weaknesses in handling ambiguity, information coverage, and diagnostic reasoning, with process failures like repetitive questioning and omitted history.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LLMs Outperform Humans in Next Speaker Prediction

Large language models outperformed humans and supervised models in next speaker prediction using the AMI corpus, despite lacking audio-visual data and domain training. Multimodal LLMs surpassed text-based LLMs in addressee and turn-change detection but still fell short of human performance, highlighting challenges in utilizing raw audio-visual signals. Ablation studies show conversational context is crucial, especially for next speaker prediction, with both humans and LLMs struggling during frequent turn changes.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

LLM-Designed Training Environment for RL with Multi-Agent Reasoning

The LLM-as-Environment-Engineer framework uses LLMs to automatically redesign training environments in reinforcement learning by analyzing failure trajectories and contextual data. On the MAPF-FrozenLake testbed, it outperforms larger proprietary LLMs and fixed-environment baselines, with Qwen3-4B achieving the strongest aggregate performance. Analysis shows that failure evidence and preserved working configurations are key, and the current RL checkpoint performs better than the base model as an environment engineer.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

EComAgentBench: Benchmarking Shopping Agents with Hidden Intent

EComAgentBench introduces a benchmark of 662 real Amazon tasks that scatter shopper requirements across query, profile, and clarification. Agents must uncover hidden intent, verify candidates with evidence, and commit to a product within 100 tool calls, with typed rubrics attributing failures to specific requirement sources. Evaluation shows even top models achieve only 57.1% accuracy, and rubric satisfaction drops when intent is hidden.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale

We present a framework for evaluating agentic skills by constructing realistic tasks and assessing skill utility through task execution. Applied to 500 real-world skills, it generates 1,000 tasks and scoring rubrics, evaluating 19 agent-model configurations across proprietary and open-source models. Results show significant variation in instruction adherence and performance gains, with skills substantially altering model behavior compared to no-skill setups.