Lab · DeepSeek
arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 6d ago

Lean as Process-Verified Reward Oracle in RL for Theorem Proving

This work shows that Lean can serve as a symbolic process oracle, providing fine-grained, verified feedback during reinforcement learning. By parsing proof attempts into tactic sequences and using Lean's elaboration to mark sound steps and first failures, the system generates dense, type-theoretic reward signals. Experiments demonstrate tactic-level supervision outperforms outcome-only methods on benchmarks like MiniF2F and ProofNet, highlighting Lean's role as both evaluator and training reward source.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 7d ago

Diffusion-Proof: First Framework for Diffusion LLMs in Formal Theorem Proving

Diffusion-Proof is the first framework to train and apply diffusion language models for formal theorem proving. It introduces dLLM-Prover-7B for whole-proof writing with long-range coherence and dLLM-Corrector-7- for local proof correction using bidirectional information. The framework outperforms auto-regressive LLM baselines by 1.61% on ProofNet-Test and 6.14% on MiniF2F-Test, and solves an IMO problem beyond the capability of DeepSeek-Prover-V2-7B.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 7d ago

SenFlow: Advanced AI-Generated Text Detection in Hybrid Documents

SenFlow introduces a novel method for detecting AI-generated text in hybrid documents by modeling inter-sentence dependencies. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on MOSAIC, a benchmark of 16,000 documents from PubMed and XSum, with a +4.15 pp Macro-F1 gain on cross-domain transfer. SenFlow reveals that AI-generated content still exhibits generator-dependent sentence-length patterns, exploitable by sentence-level detectors despite perplexity filtering.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

Agentic Benchmark Reveals AI Models Fail to Avoid Animal Exploitation

TAC, the first agentic benchmark for implicit animal welfare, tests AI agents' ability to avoid animal exploitation in travel booking scenarios. All seven frontier models score below 64%, with the best at 53%, and even minor prompt improvements yield only modest gains. An audit finds no signs of evaluation awareness, indicating performance gaps stem from lack of true welfare reasoning, not prompt recognition.

arxiv arXiv cs.CL · 8d ago

Visuals Lie, Consistency Speaks: Disentangling Spatial Attention from Reliability in Vision-Language Models

A study challenges the assumption that visual attention signals reliability in vision-language models. It finds near-zero correlation between spatial attention and accuracy, showing instead that self-consistency across reasoning paths is a stronger predictor of truth. Reliability is better explained by generation dynamics and internal state distributions, not visual attention patterns.

arxiv arXiv cs.AI · 7d ago

X+Slides: Benchmark for Audience-Conditioned Slide Generation

X+Slides introduces a benchmark that evaluates slide generation based on target audience needs. It uses 8,133 source-grounded probes across 113 topics and seven scenes to measure Audience Coverage, Domain-wise Coverage, Efficiency, and Correctness, revealing that current systems recover only partial audience-essential information, with DeepPresenter achieving 0.714 Audience Coverage, SlideTailor 0.594, and NotebookLM ablation 0.853, highlighting the need for source-grounded evaluation.

arxiv arXiv cs.LG · 8d ago

Baseline Evaluation of Open-Source LLMs for Multi-Label ATT&CK Classification

A ground-truth dataset of 2,076 human-annotated sentences from 83 complex CTI reports was constructed and mapped to 114 ATT&CK techniques with \k{appa} = 0.68 inter-annotator agreement. Seven open-source LLMs ranging from 8B to 236B parameters were evaluated, achieving a maximum micro-averaged F1 score of 0.22. Parameter size showed a statistically significant positive correlation with F1 score, while prompt strategy and temperature did not yield significant improvements, indicating current open-source LLMs are insufficient for production-grade ATT&CK classification.