A ground-truth dataset of 2,076 human-annotated sentences from 83 complex CTI reports was constructed and mapped to 114 ATT&CK techniques with \k{appa} = 0.68 inter-annotator agreement. Seven open-source LLMs ranging from 8B to 236B parameters were evaluated, achieving a maximum micro-averaged F1 score of 0.22. Parameter size showed a statistically significant positive correlation with F1 score, while prompt strategy and temperature did not yield significant improvements, indicating current open-source LLMs are insufficient for production-grade ATT&CK classification.
Baseline Evaluation of Open-Source LLMs for Multi-Label ATT&CK Classification
from English