NRT-Bench introduces a benchmark for multi-turn red-teaming of LLM agents operating in a simulated nuclear power plant. Across four frontier operator models, 8.7% to 12.1% of attack sessions result in loss of a critical safety function, with vulnerabilities largely disjoint across models. The effectiveness of defences varies significantly by model, showing strong model dependence.
NRT-Bench: Multi-turn Red-teaming of LLM Agents in Safety-Critical Systems
Defensive Misdirection Against Automated Attacks on Agentic AI
Agentic AI systems face growing threats from model-guided automated attacks. A new defense strategy, Contextual Misdirection via Progressive Engagement (CMPE), reduces attacker success rates by up to two orders of magnitude and nearly eliminates verified attack success in benchmark tests.
Over-Privileged Tool Selection in LLM Agents
LLM agents commonly select higher-privilege tools despite sufficient lower-privilege alternatives. This over-privileged behavior is amplified by transient tool failures and does not reliably improve with general safety alignment. A new privilege-aware post-training defense reduces unnecessary high-privilege tool use while maintaining agent capabilities.
TRAP: Benchmark for Task-completion and Resistance to Active Privacy-extraction
TRAP evaluates how well models complete tasks using private data without leaking it. Across 22 models, all show non-trivial privacy leakage, with instruction-following ability linked to higher leakage. Structural private field isolation prevents leakage by replacing private fields with hash keys, maintaining task accuracy without sacrificing privacy.
PARSE: Real-Document Defense for LLM Agents
PARSE reduces prompt injection attack success from 25.4% to 15.6% on real enterprise documents across five professional domains, with statistically significant improvement (p=0.014) and 86.9% utility. It outperforms paraphrasing and uses provenance-aware sanitization to preserve factual content while routing most documents through a lightweight path.
GPT-5 outperforms humans in inducing belief states via planning
A new study evaluates Large Language Models' ability to induce specific belief states in other agents through actions rather than conversation, a capability termed Non-Conversational Planning ToM (NCP-ToM). Using the NCP-ExploreToM framework, researchers tested six frontier models and human participants on 600 task instances where agents had to move objects or direct characters to achieve belief goals.