The new DeepSeek V4-Flash model has achieved a score of 50 on the ArtificialAnalysis Index. This result places it just one point below GLM-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Luna.
media
r/LocalLLaMA
·
46d ago
·
open_models
DeepSeek V4-Flash achieves 50 on ArtificialAnalysis Index
from English
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | DeepSeek V4-Flash | 50% |
Related articles
media
MarkTechPost
·
58d ago
·
43 views
Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and GLM-5.2 compared on benchmarks, license, and serving cost
A comparison of three open-weight sparse Mixture-of-Experts models—Moonshot AI's Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Zhipu AI's GLM-5.2—evaluates their capabilities, licensing terms, and serving costs for long-horizon coding and agent workloads.
media
r/LocalLLaMA
·
19h ago
·
3 views
Base-10's Charlie O'Neill argues Kimi and GLM are better than Opus 5
Charlie O'Neill of Base-10 discusses why the Kimi and GLM models are "almost objectively" superior to Opus 5 in a recent episode featuring Dwarkesh Patel.
media
r/LocalLLaMA
·
2d ago
·
3 views
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash tops Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has taken first place on the new Astra benchmark within the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 update.
media
r/LocalLLaMA
·
5d ago
·
4 views
LiveBench adds DeepSeek v4.1 Flash
The LiveBench benchmarking platform has added the DeepSeek v4.1 Flash model to its evaluation suite.
media
Together AI Blog
·
18d ago
·
27 views
GLM-5.3 Flash distillation trades consistency for 17x cost reduction
A comparison of GLM-5.3 and its distilled variant, GLM-5.3 Flash, on the DeepSWE benchmark reveals that distillation preserves core coding capability while significantly reducing rollout costs. The full model achieves a 69.0% pass@1 rate at $3.99 per task, whereas the Flash variant scores 63.4% at just $0.24, representing a 17x price reduction.